Nettet27. mar. 2013 · Ledesma (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 857 ( Ledesma), to justify the protective sweep of defendant's residence. In Buie, six or seven police officers arrived … NettetUnder the facts known to them, the police could conduct a protective sweep of a house which a probationer with a search condition had identified as her residence and which they verified with county records. Although she could not enter the house the day before because it was locked, she had pointed through the window…

W 18 EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES

NettetLedesma v. CA. G.R. No. 86051. September 1, 1992. "ARTICLE 559. The possession of movable property acquired in good faith is equivalent to a title. Nevertheless, one who … Nettet(Ledesma (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 857.) Example: Police went to a probationer's residence to conduct a probation search. Cotenant, who appeared to be under the … marion attias facebook

People v. Garcia B256843 Cal. Ct. App. Judgment Law

Nettet28. feb. 2003 · 131 Cal.Rptr.2d 249 106 Cal.App.4th 857 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Michael Gregory LEDESMA, Defendant and Appellant. No. A097337. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5. February 28, 2003. Certified for Partial Publication. Rehearing Denied April 1, 2003. Review Denied May 14, 2003. [131 … NettetLedesma (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 857, 862.) We defer to the trial court s factual findings, express or implied, where supported by substantial evidence. In determining whether, on the facts so found, the search or seizure was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, we exercise our independent judgment. [Citations.] (People v. Nettet1. mai 2014 · Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to: nature valley sweet and salty nut